I grew up in church in the 90s, which meant I grew up in the midst of the purity culture movement.
There were good elements of that movement. The desire to be pure is a noble and good desire to have. But because we are fallen human beings, that good desire seemed to turn into a pharisaical one as the movement gained traction.
The purity rings worn and vows taken to not have premarital sex were good, but they also slowly became a status symbol which caused young men and women who were in danger of burning with lust to view their potential future spouses as those who would solve that problem. The movement placed too much weight on other fallen human beings and did not leave much room for grace if that purity status was lost.
I remember thinking something was wrong with this movement when some friends told me they would never even think about marrying a woman who was not pure, even if that was through no fault of her own.
While the movement began well enough, the movement sadly deformed fairly quickly. Many in the current “deconstruction” movement of our day, when talking about why they left, mention the moral demands heaped upon them, and how their knees buckled under all that weight.
In one way that makes sense. As Christians, we are supposed to fight sin and to avoid even the appearance of sin. Those demands, if one is not in Christ, are crushing. Only Christ carried that weight perfectly, and to attempt to carry that burden without Him will inevitably lead one to be crushed.
But it was not simply those who deconstructed their faith who were affected by the purity culture movement. Many fellow Christians my age, as we near our forties, still struggle with the negative effects.
I think I know why.
In those sermons and talks that ended with youths giving vows to be pure, the end goal was too low, and the reason for remaining pure was placed on another person in marriage who could never hope to fulfill us.
There was no true telos, no true end goal. Without an end goal, without a purpose, we are left holding the moral weight of resisting sin for as long as we can. We thought holiness meant not doing what the world wanted us to do. We thought holiness was like those old “World’s Strongest Man” competitions, where contestants would see how long they could shoulder heavy weights.
In the end, no matter who won, everyone dropped the weight. No one could bear that burden forever.
The command to be holy includes refraining from sin. Yet that command is only part of the definition.
When we are told, “You shall be holy, for I am holy” (1 Pet. 1:16), do we picture the holiness of God as boring or stifling? Do we picture His holiness more as what He does not do and not as one of His attributes, of who He is? If we think holiness is boring, and holiness is one of His attributes, do we think that God is bored with Himself?
I hope the answer to those questions is a resounding “No.” How can God, who is perfectly satisfied in Himself, ever be bored? But that is the logical implication when we define holiness simply as not doing what we want. Our stunted view of holiness can negatively shape our walk with Christ.
So what is holiness?
Holiness is defined as being set apart for a purpose. The reason Christians do not run after the desires with which the world, the flesh, and the devil present us is that we have been set apart for something better. As God is perfectly happy and satisfied in Himself, so too we are to find our full and lasting pleasure in glorifying and enjoying our union with Christ for eternity. We are saved and set apart from sin to glorify God and enjoy Him forever.
Holiness is not a shackle we wear to keep us from doing what we want but is more like giving us wings to fly above sinful desires in pursuit of the higher pleasure of following Christ.
Christianity is not about doing the least bad thing. It is not about choosing the lesser of two evils. But it is about being saved from death to life, of being set apart for a purpose. Yes, the life of the Christian involves self-control, self-denial, and even death to self. But all of this is for a purpose: to pursue the good, the true, and the beautiful, and chiefly therefore to pursue excellence in all things as children of God.
Paul Washer hit the nail on the head when he said, “A lot of people think that Christianity is you doing all the righteous things you hate and avoiding all the wicked things you love in order to go to Heaven. No, that’s a lost man with religion. A Christian is a person whose heart has been changed; they have new affections.”
The vow to remain pure that many of us took was a good one. But anyone can take that vow. Anyone can think that being holy, being pure, means not doing what we want to do and doing the things we do not really want. But that is not Christianity. That is not what the Scriptures mean when they promise that the LORD Himself “will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you” as well as “remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh” (Ezek. 36:26).
Our desires, though still pulled down by the world, the flesh, and the devil, have been changed. Our new heart, and the Holy Spirit within us, have fundamentally changed our desires and given us new purpose. That purpose is more than resisting evil but means we resist evil, we resist the transitory desires of the world because we are pursuing far greater satisfaction found in Christ alone.
We are the ones who have been set apart. We are told to, “Go, and from now on sin no more” (John 8:11), but we are indeed given more. We are given life eternal, true, and lasting joy, and the desire to follow Christ who shows us the better way because He is the way, He is the truth, and He is the life.
There were good elements of that movement. The desire to be pure is a noble and good desire to have. But because we are fallen human beings, that good desire seemed to turn into a pharisaical one as the movement gained traction.
The purity rings worn and vows taken to not have premarital sex were good, but they also slowly became a status symbol which caused young men and women who were in danger of burning with lust to view their potential future spouses as those who would solve that problem. The movement placed too much weight on other fallen human beings and did not leave much room for grace if that purity status was lost.
I remember thinking something was wrong with this movement when some friends told me they would never even think about marrying a woman who was not pure, even if that was through no fault of her own.
While the movement began well enough, the movement sadly deformed fairly quickly. Many in the current “deconstruction” movement of our day, when talking about why they left, mention the moral demands heaped upon them, and how their knees buckled under all that weight.
In one way that makes sense. As Christians, we are supposed to fight sin and to avoid even the appearance of sin. Those demands, if one is not in Christ, are crushing. Only Christ carried that weight perfectly, and to attempt to carry that burden without Him will inevitably lead one to be crushed.
But it was not simply those who deconstructed their faith who were affected by the purity culture movement. Many fellow Christians my age, as we near our forties, still struggle with the negative effects.
I think I know why.
In those sermons and talks that ended with youths giving vows to be pure, the end goal was too low, and the reason for remaining pure was placed on another person in marriage who could never hope to fulfill us.
There was no true telos, no true end goal. Without an end goal, without a purpose, we are left holding the moral weight of resisting sin for as long as we can. We thought holiness meant not doing what the world wanted us to do. We thought holiness was like those old “World’s Strongest Man” competitions, where contestants would see how long they could shoulder heavy weights.
In the end, no matter who won, everyone dropped the weight. No one could bear that burden forever.
The command to be holy includes refraining from sin. Yet that command is only part of the definition.
When we are told, “You shall be holy, for I am holy” (1 Pet. 1:16), do we picture the holiness of God as boring or stifling? Do we picture His holiness more as what He does not do and not as one of His attributes, of who He is? If we think holiness is boring, and holiness is one of His attributes, do we think that God is bored with Himself?
I hope the answer to those questions is a resounding “No.” How can God, who is perfectly satisfied in Himself, ever be bored? But that is the logical implication when we define holiness simply as not doing what we want. Our stunted view of holiness can negatively shape our walk with Christ.
So what is holiness?
Holiness is defined as being set apart for a purpose. The reason Christians do not run after the desires with which the world, the flesh, and the devil present us is that we have been set apart for something better. As God is perfectly happy and satisfied in Himself, so too we are to find our full and lasting pleasure in glorifying and enjoying our union with Christ for eternity. We are saved and set apart from sin to glorify God and enjoy Him forever.
Holiness is not a shackle we wear to keep us from doing what we want but is more like giving us wings to fly above sinful desires in pursuit of the higher pleasure of following Christ.
Christianity is not about doing the least bad thing. It is not about choosing the lesser of two evils. But it is about being saved from death to life, of being set apart for a purpose. Yes, the life of the Christian involves self-control, self-denial, and even death to self. But all of this is for a purpose: to pursue the good, the true, and the beautiful, and chiefly therefore to pursue excellence in all things as children of God.
Paul Washer hit the nail on the head when he said, “A lot of people think that Christianity is you doing all the righteous things you hate and avoiding all the wicked things you love in order to go to Heaven. No, that’s a lost man with religion. A Christian is a person whose heart has been changed; they have new affections.”
The vow to remain pure that many of us took was a good one. But anyone can take that vow. Anyone can think that being holy, being pure, means not doing what we want to do and doing the things we do not really want. But that is not Christianity. That is not what the Scriptures mean when they promise that the LORD Himself “will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you” as well as “remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh” (Ezek. 36:26).
Our desires, though still pulled down by the world, the flesh, and the devil, have been changed. Our new heart, and the Holy Spirit within us, have fundamentally changed our desires and given us new purpose. That purpose is more than resisting evil but means we resist evil, we resist the transitory desires of the world because we are pursuing far greater satisfaction found in Christ alone.
We are the ones who have been set apart. We are told to, “Go, and from now on sin no more” (John 8:11), but we are indeed given more. We are given life eternal, true, and lasting joy, and the desire to follow Christ who shows us the better way because He is the way, He is the truth, and He is the life.
About The Author
JOSEPH L. HAMRICK III
1689 Federalism | Amillennialism
Joseph L. Hamrick III is a Reformed Baptist Christian who serves as a pastor at Commerce Community Church (C3) in Commerce, TX, where he and his wife, Jesse, live. Joseph holds a BA in Liberal Studies from the Texas A&M University-Commerce and writes a weekly column via Substack where he writes about the Christian life. When he is not at work, he can usually be found with a Bible, a work of Dostoevsky, or some other book in his hands.
1689 Federalism | Amillennialism
Joseph L. Hamrick III is a Reformed Baptist Christian who serves as a pastor at Commerce Community Church (C3) in Commerce, TX, where he and his wife, Jesse, live. Joseph holds a BA in Liberal Studies from the Texas A&M University-Commerce and writes a weekly column via Substack where he writes about the Christian life. When he is not at work, he can usually be found with a Bible, a work of Dostoevsky, or some other book in his hands.
Recent
Archive
2025
January
A Treatise Against Impotent Cultural ChristianityKnowledge Versus Knowing: Experiential ChristianityThe Plumb Line, Not The PendulumBrutally Honest WorshipFive Books Every New Calvinist Should ReadFlirting With AbominationsHow to Biblically Support the PastorGrassroots HomeschoolingPurity, Holiness, and the Joy of the LordHonor Your Father and MotherThe Sovereignty of God The Eternality and Aseity of God
2024
May
IVF is Evil.Find Your WhyWhy Do We Struggle with Self-Control?Old Time ReligionThe Pastor and His BibleLessons from Jude Pt. 4: The Dreams of False TeachersJoining with Creation: Why Your Praise Matters to GodChrist is Worthy of a Healthy ChurchBiblical Discernment and Why It Is NecessaryWhat is the Point of the Bible?Faith Cometh: First Mention Basics of Faith Pt. 2
June
July
Is God For Us?What Laws Are We Supposed to Obey?Remember MeDying Thoughts of a Godly ManOn Justification through Faith Alone in Christ AloneHigh Strangeness and a Christian ResponseDiscovering Perfect FaithfulnessChildren: The Best Bible School for AdultsThe Trembling PastorUnderstanding the Law: Part I
September
Rest In ChristFive Minutes for the Imago DeiUnderstanding the Law: Part IIThe Privilege of Knowing God TrulyEphesians: Abounding Riches of GracePrayer and Providence: A Look At Mark 7:24-30The Love of GodEphesians: Our Inheritance, Hope, and Glory in ChristThe Immutability of GodFighting Sin by Trusting in the Superior Satisfaction
December
Categories
Tags
17th Century
70 A.D.
Abandonment
Academics
Actions
Adam
Adoption
All-Powerful
Almighty God
Androgyny
Angels
Animosity
Antinomianism
Anxiety
Aseity
Assurance
Atonement
Attributes of God
Attrition
Augustine of Hippo
Authority
Awe
Baptism
Batman
Belief
Betrayal
Bible Reading
Bible School
Bible Study
Bigfoot
Bitterness
Blame
Blandina
Bookish
Bravery
Business
Busyness
C.S. Lewis
Calvinism
Camaraderie
Catechism
Ceremonial Law
Challenges
Change
Chants
Chaos
Characteristics of God
Character
Charlatans
Charles Spurgeon
Children
Choice
Chords
Chrisitan Living
Christian Walk
Christology
Church Officer
Circumstances
Civil Law
Clash of the Titans
Claude Ramsey
Clefs
Commandments
Commentary
Communion
Composers
Confession
Contentment
Conversion
Conviction
Coram Deo
Corporate Worship
Creation
Cryogenics
Culture
Death
Decree
Defamation
Dementia
Demons
Dependance
Desire
Devastation
Diligence
Disagreement
Discernment
Discipleship
Discipline
Disobedience
Doctrines of Grace
Doctrine
Dreams
Drudgery
Ecclesiology
Education
Elect
Embryo Grading
Emotionalism
Encouragement
Endor
English Puritanism
Entrepreneurship
Ephesians
Eternaliy
Ethnomusicology
Eugenics
Eusebius
Evangelicalism
Evangelism
Evangelist
Evil
Exhortation
Expectations
Experiential Christianity
Fables
Failure
Fairy Tales
Faithfulness
Faithlessness
Faith
False Teachers
Familial Relationships
Families
Family Dynamics
Family Worship
Famine
Farming
Fasting
Fear
Fellowship
Femininity
Fertilization
Fervor
Five Points
Forgiveness
Form
Foster Care
Free Will
Function
Fuxs Counterpoint
Gatherings
Gathering
Gender Distinction
Gender Equality
Gentiles
Gentleness
George Whitefield
Ghosts
Giants
Glory
God's Presence
Goodness
Good
Gospel Mission
Gospel
Grace
Grassroots
Gratitude
Greek Mythology
Grief
Happiness
Hardship
Help
Herodotus
Heroes of Renown
Heroes
Holiness
Homemaking
Homeschooling
Homesteading
Honor Your Parents
Hope
Human Trafficking
Humility
Humphrey Bogart
Hypocrisy
Hypocrites
IVF
Identity
Idolatry
Immutability
In Vitro Fertilization
Incan Empire
Inheritance
Intellectualism
Israel
James White
Jason and the Argonauts
Jerusalem
Jews
John Calvin
John Frame
John Knox
Joy
Judaism
Jude
Judges
Judging
Justification
Kids
Knowledge
Law
Laziness
Learning
Legalism
Legend
Life
Light
Liturgy
Local Church
Love
Luke Bryan
Malak
Marcus Aurelius
Marriage
Martyrdom
Masculinity
Matthew Henry
Meditation
Memory.
Mercy
Minds
Ministry Support
Molech
Monergism
Money
Monotony
Moral Law
Morality
Mosaic Law
Mothman
Motivation
Music Theory
Musical Education
Musical Notation
Musicology
Music
Mystery
Mysticism
Myth
Nations
Nature of God
Neglect
Nephilim
Nervousness
New Covenant
Nick Needham
Nominal Christianity
Notes
Obedience
Old Covenant
Old Testament
Omnipotence
Omnipresence
Omniscience
Online
Order
Orthodox Jew
Pain
Parents
Pastor Appreciation
Pastoral Support
Pastor
Paul The Apostle
Paul Washer
Peace
Pentateuch
Persecution
Perseverance
Plagiarism
Politics
Pornography
Power of God
Power
Praise
Prayer
Praying
Preacher
Preaching
Preparation
Pride
Priest
Privilege
Prophesy
Prophets
Providence
Psalms
Pulpit Ministry
Punishment
Purification
Purity
Purpose
Qualification
Questions
Quick Wit
Reality Shows
Recommended Reading
Reconciliation
Redemption
Reflection
Reformed Books
Reformed Evangelism
Regeneration
Regulative Principle
Religion
Rememberance
Repentance
Responsibility
Rest
Revelation
Reverence
Revival
Reward
Rhetoric
Richard Baxter
Riches
Righteousness
Roman Empire
Romans
Rome
Sabbath
Sacrifice
Sacrificial System
Saints
Salvation
Sanctification
Sarcasm
Satisfaction
Self-Control
Self-Discipline
Self-Examination
Self-Presentation
Sermon Preparation
Serpent
Service
Sex Selection
Shame
ShatteredHopes
Sickness
Sinbad
Sin
Social Media
Songs
Sovereignty
Speech
Spirits
Spiritual Development
Spiritual Warfare
Spirit
Staves
Stewardship
Story
Struggles
Study Group
Study
Style
Suffering
Sundays
Supernatural
Supplication
Surrender
Teacher
Teaching
Teleology
Temporal
Temptations
Temptation
Thankfulness
The Bible
The Great Commission
The Holy Scriptures
The Joker
The Local Church
The Lords Supper
The Lyons Region
The Sons of Korah
The Word of God
Theology
Thomas Brooks
Thorpe
Tim Challies
Torah
Total Depravity
Tradition
Transcendence
Trembling
Trials
Trouble
Trust
Truth
Tulip
Turner Classic Movies
Tyre
UFO
Unchanging
Understanding
Unexplained
Unseen Realm
Verse By Verse
Villians
Virtue
Wailing
Warning
War
Weakness
Wealth
Weeping
Western Music
Westminster Confession
Wisdom
Witch
Wonder
Words
Worldview
Worship
Youngsters
family bible reading
hypocrasy